A question that often arises is whether an exchange of e-mails constitutes an agreement. The answer is yes, but it is not ideal as the contractual requirement of ‘offer and acceptance’ must be met.
This means that if party A offers something to party B, and B then makes a counteroffer, there is no binding agreement unless A accepts the counteroffer.
“It is not ideal as the contractual requirement of ‘offer and acceptance’ must be met.”
The following happened in a recent case: B owed A money and they were in the process of negotiating a settlement (compromise) by exchange of e-mails. B made a settlement proposal which A accepted provided the final settlement agreement was made an order of court which condition A reflected in a settlement agreement submitted to B.
Upon receipt of the settlement agreement, B made a number of changes and made no mention of the court order requirement. This response was thus a counteroffer which was open to A to reject or accept. B argued that it was not a counteroffer but an acceptance.
The court held that as the response from B made no mention of the court order, it was not (as required by law) an unambiguous and unequivocal acceptance by B and therefore was not legally enforceable.
DISCLAIMER: Each case depends on its own facts & merits. The above does not constitute advice. Independent advice should be obtained in all instances.
Click here to find out more about Louis-the-Lawyerβs Legal Advice Club special offer.
Have a legal question? Ask Louis-the-Lawyer!
Send your questions for Advocate Louis Nel to pippa@independentwriting.co.za. We will respond to all your questions even if it takes time and additional research, so please be patient. However we will give preference to the most pressing and commonly asked ones.
